It’s been 15 years since Casio introduced the Privia digital piano series. To celebrate this anniversary, Casio has released two new keyboard series, the PX-S and CDP-S.
The ‘S’ in each name shows the main selling point of these new keyboards – the slim factor.
While the CDP-S series aims to be as affordable as possible, the PX-S series (which will be the focus of this review) focuses on innovation instead.
With the PX-S series, Casio attempted to merge innovation with some choice risks to make a piano that could be both slim and immensely playable, the results of which are impressive on paper.
Casio has reaffirmed that the PX-S series is all new, featuring a new chassis, new key action, new sounds, and a lot more additions that make for a new experience.
Some features new to the Privia-series were also incorporated from Casio’s acoustic-digital hybrid Celviano series, giving the PX-S series enhanced acoustic simulation and sound quality.
Just the other day we reviewed the starter model of the PX-S series – the PX-S1000, and the focus of today’s review is its more advanced brother, the PX-S3000.
The PX-S3000 incorporates extra features that make it a hybrid digital piano/arranger keyboard, but do the extra features justify the increased price point?
Let’s find out.
Casio PX-S3000 Specs
- Smart Scaled Hammer Action Keyboard with simulated ebony/ivory key textures
- 88 full-size fully weighted keys
- Touch Sensitivity (5 types, Off)
- Sound: Multi-dimensional Morphing AiR Sound Source
- 192-note polyphony
- 700 instrument sounds
- Modes: Dual, Split
- 3-track MIDI recorder, Audio Recorder (WAV, 16bit, 44.1kHz, stereo)
- 200 Built-in Rhythms (6 chord input modes), Arpeggiator (100 types)
- Pitch Bend Wheel, 2 Assignable Knobs
- Fully editable DSP parameters (+100 presets), Reverb (8 types), Hall Simulator (4 types), Surround (2 types), Chorus (12 types)
- Registration function (96 sets)
- Acoustic Simulator (adjustable): String/Damper/Key Off Resonance, Damper Noise, Key On/Off Action Noise (4 levels, off), hammer response (non-adjustable)
- Metronome, Transpose, Master Tuning
- 17 Temperament Options
- Speakers: 8W + 8W (two 16cm x 8cm oval speakers)
- Connections: USB to Host (type B), USB to Device (type A), Bluetooth 5.0 (Audio only), Headphone jacks (2), Sustain Pedal jack, Line Out (R, L/Mono), Audio In (stereo mini jack), Expression Pedal/Assignable jack
- W x D x H: 52” x 9.1” x 4” (132.2 x 23.2 x 10.2 cm)
- 25.1 lbs (11.4 kg)
- Release Date: March 2019
Check the availability and current price of the Casio PX-S3000 in your region:
Design
In terms of design, the PX-S3000 (much like its little brother, the PX-S1000) is quite unique. The chassis itself is visually striking, both in terms of looks and size.
Just as the PX-S series was designed to be slim, the PX-S3000 packs its features into a compact package, coming in at an impressive 52” (width) x 9.1” (depth) x 4” (height) (132.2 x 23.2 x 10.2 cm). These are the same dimensions as the PX-S1000.
The PX-S1000 and PX-S3000 are both marketed as the slimmest 88-key weighted digital pianos available, and at the time of writing that title is undisputed by a longshot.
This small form factor makes the PX-S3000 an easy instrument to transport, making it ideal for both home and stage use.
The relatively lightweight nature of the keyboard (25.1 lbs./11.4 kg) means that you’ll be able to move the PX-S3000 around quite easily.
For comparison, the PX-S1000 weighs 0.4 lbs. (0.2 kg) less, but the extra features are certainly worth the added weight.
The PX-S3000 has a glossy plastic surface, which sets it apart from the matte plastic surfaces found on other digital pianos and keyboards.
While this does look impressive, you’ll find that the glossy surface is a fingerprint magnet. Being plastic, you’ll also need to deal with scratches when collisions occur.
The unique design of the PX-S3000 also comes from its controls. When switched off, the PX-S3000 is practically spotless, with only a simple Privia logo and a small 3-line LCD screen on the body.
The touch-based control interface uses capacitive touch, which is the same tech found on modern smartphones and tablets.
I found the controls to be responsive enough, and you’ll always be able to hit the button you’re aiming for, especially once you get used to the effective areas of each button.
The lack of tactile feedback might not appeal to everyone, but I can accept it as a necessary compromise for reducing weight and depth.
A single capacitive surface is naturally less bulky than many buttons with moving parts.
When you turn the PX-S3000 on, the buttons light up and clearly indicate each button, which looks very stylish and modern. The lights are bright enough to be seen under low-light conditions, making it ideal for stage performances.
Thanks to the high contrast, you’ll also find the buttons usable in bright situations as well.
Unlike the PX-S1000, the PX-S3000 comes with a compact 3-line LED screen. This makes navigating the PX-S3000 a lot easier, since you’ve got text to guide you along.
The screen also helps ensure that you don’t get lost while cycling through the long list of features.
Going with LED (as opposed to LCD) technology means that you get a lot more brightness, and if you do decide to use batteries, this means a lot less power-drain.
Having previously reviewed the PX-S1000, I find the screen very helpful. Instead of relying on manual, complex key combinations, I can use the on-screen text to assist.
For example, when switching through the 700+ sounds, being able to know what sound I’m on without needing to play a note is very helpful.
We cover this in detail under the Connectivity section. However, I found the experience of playing the PX-S3000 to be complete without the app.
This is a definite plus for performers and gigging musicians, and it adds further portability of the PX-S3000.
Unfortunately, 2 hours is not as much as the 4-hour battery life on the PX-S1000 and probably won’t last a full gig.
The PX-S3000 comes with an AC adapter that can be used instead, and I envision most performers will opt for this method of powering.
Overall, the PX-S3000 has an excellent design, built off the solid base of the PX-S1000.
The improvements do enhance the user experience, and as someone who favors a smooth, uninterrupted playing experience, the PX-S3000 both looks and feels good to operate.
The biggest difference when compared to the PX-S1000 is the inclusion of two assignable knobs.
These make the PX-S3000 much more suited for performances, since you can modify performances on the fly.
Furthermore, there’s also a pitch bend wheel that makes synth sounds a lot more expressive.
Keyboard
Casio’s PX-S3000 shares the same key action found on the PX-S1000. We’ve covered the keyboard in detail in our PX-S1000 review, so feel free to refer to that review for more details on how the action works.
The PX-S3000 features the Smart Scaled Hammer Action, which is a new 2-sensor action developed specifically for the compact size of the new PX-S series.
Overall, the keys feel great. They are responsive and allow for quick note repetitions without any issues.
A common complaint with two sensor actions concerns reduced accuracy (when quickly repeating the same notes), but the PX-S series sidesteps this problem by using software, hence the “Smart” in the name.
The keyboard feels slightly different from the three-sensor, Tri Sensor Hammer Action II in previous Privia digital pianos and comes with some important improvements (and limitations unfortunately).
Mechanically, the new action feels similar to the previous generation action used in all Privia digital pianos up to this point.
However, in order to adapt the new key action to the compact body of the PX-S3000, Casio had to reduce its size, which negatively affected the pivot point length.
Since there’s less space inside the chassis, the action has become shorter as well, making it harder to play the keys further up the fallboard.
This is especially noticeable when you’re trying to play the white keys in between the black ones at their upper points.
This is the only negative I’ve noticed in the new keyboard action compared to the previous one.
It’s important to note the Smart Scaled Hammer Action is considerably quieter and a bit less bouncy than the older action.
The keys are plastic, but they have simulated ebony and ivory surfaces, giving them a textured surface that prevents slippage during play. The texture has also been slightly refined to provide an even more natural feel.
In terms of touch sensitivity, you’ve got 5 different levels, ranging from light to heavy and everything in between.
Lighter settings mean you’ll get louder playing despite softer key presses, and vice versa for heavier settings.
When compared to other key actions like Roland’s PHA-4 Standard, Korg’s RH3 and Kawai’s RHCII, the PX-S3000 feels slightly less realistic and responsive, mainly due to the issues outlined above.
These other actions also allow you to play into the keys easier, as they come with longer pivot lengths.
Regardless, do note that many have commended Casio’s new action and high quality, despite feeling slightly unrealistic in some playing scenarios.
Sound
Casio’s been marketing the PX-S series as completely new, and they’ve updated the older sounds found on previous Privia digital pianos.
It still features Casio’s famous AiR sound engine, but it offers a new modification of it, so you can think of it as AiR 2.
The updated engine includes new sample sets. When comparing these to the ones found on the Privia PX-560 (and other older Privia instruments), it shows a definite improvement.
This can be attributed to the improved reverb, space, and resonance simulation algorithms available on the PX-S3000. These algorithms help bring the sounds to life quite nicely by placing them in a simulated space.
Some have described the PX-S3000 as a digital piano/arranger hybrid, and the fact that you’re getting 700 sounds here is a huge upgrade over the 18 sounds on the PX-S1000.
There’s a lot of choices here, and it’s very easy to find the sounds you want.
The sounds are grouped to the different buttons found on the front panel, but they’re also sorted into different subcategories.
For example, pressing the OTHERS button will first show you world instruments, but the following presses will show you the synths, guitars, basses and drum kits.
What’s great about the PX-S3000 is that there’s no cut off when switching between the tones, which means you can sustain a sound, then switch to another one, start playing it, while the previous tone is still sounding.
With many keyboards, the tone will be immediately cut off when you switch to a different tone, which can be a big problem during live performances.
Now, let’s cover the main attraction, the piano sounds.
The piano sounds, much like those off the PX-S1000, are sampled from an unspecified 9-foot concert grand, but their main draw is their versatility.
You have concert grands, bright pianos, and other genre specific pianos that work well regardless of play style. I really like the Stage Piano, Mellow Grand Piano and Jazz Piano presets, due to their neutral, uncolored sound.
Take a listen to a few of the many tones available on the PX-S3000:
The integration of the Celviano series’ acoustic simulation means you can modify many parameters of each piano sound.
The modifiable parameters include String Resonance, Damper Resonance, Damper Noise, and Key On/Off Action Noise. Each setting includes 4 different intensities and can be turned off as well.
If you like extra control, this really does allow you to shape the piano’s sounds to your liking.
Other Sounds
The true strength of the PX-S3000 over the PX-S1000 are the other sounds on offer.
Electric pianos include both synthesized and amped-up variations of classic sounds.
Whether you’re going for the 70s-style Wurlitzer and Rhodes sounds or the famous FM-synthesis sounds of the 80s, there’s a lot of authentic tones available here.
Harpsichords and vibraphones also come with many variations, including a pretty good music box and xylophone emulation.
However, organs are where the PX-S3000 really excels. The responsive, not overly heavy keys make glides and organ-specific playstyles easy to do, and the knobs mean you can simulate drawbar effects to a certain degree as well.
Speaking of the knobs, they make the synths voices a joy to play. The sounds are lush enough as they are but being able to switch the filter cutoff on the fly means that you can implement buildups and variations easily.
Guitar sounds are also included, and the amount of detail available is quite impressive.
While you might need a manual the first few times you try it out, you’ll find that expressive playing is definitely possible.
You can switch between strumming, muted, and ghost notes and so on by switching through the octaves, and there’s even support for strumming. Add different samples for different velocities to the mix, and you’ll be able to achieve a high degree of realism.
Strings are a welcome inclusion, and the pads also help fill a similar role if a different tonality is desired.
These might not sound amazing in isolation, but they are especially useful when layered with piano sounds or with anything that has a defined transient. We’ll discuss this further in the Features section of the review.
Drum kits are also included, and they cover a wide range of styles, including hip-hop’s synthetic drums and the acoustic drums which you would expect in rock and jazz.
These sounds come with decent pressure sensitivity and can be fun to play around with from time to time. You’ll mainly be using them in the form of accompaniments though. More on that shortly…
Effects
The PX-S3000 comes with 3 “Sound Mode” effects, a configurable DSP effect, a chorus unit, and variable brilliance.
Sound Mode Effects
The Sound Mode effects include the Hall Simulator, Reverb, and virtual Surround Sound modeling. The Hall Simulator and Reverb both simulate space.
The Hall Simulator replicates a large space and is identical to the effect found on the PX-S1000.
On the other hand, the Reverb unit simulates smaller ambient spaces, resulting in a more intimate sound.
The Hall Simulator has 4 main algorithms, and each has a tweakable intensity that ranges from 0 to 42. These algorithms include:
- Standard Concert Hall
- Opera Hall
- Berlin Arena Hall
- British Outdoor Stadium Hall
On the other hand, the Reverb simulator includes the following algorithms:
- 4 room algorithms
- 3 hall algorithms
- 1 stadium algorithm
All these algorithms sound good, and most come with a default reverb selected. If you like tweaking the minute details of sounds, you’ll definitely welcome the extra options.
The Surround Sound setting simulates virtual surround, making the speaker outputs feel as if they’re coming from different directions. The effect is subtle, but you get a slighter, wider sound when its on.
Note that this effect only applies through the main speakers and is disabled for sounds from the Phones or Line Out jacks. This effect is off by default, so it is optional.
DSP Effects
Casio held little back when making the PX-S3000, and their digital signal processing (DSP) chains can be edited deeply. These range from basic chorus or equalizers to complex amplifier chains with compressors, amps, and cabinet sims.
While it’s definitely not easy to edit sounds on the fly, it is convenient enough to map 2 specific controls to the assignable knobs.
For example, I can map the drive of the amps of a specific amplifier DSP effect to Knob One to add intensity to my playing on demand.
Some sounds also include DSP effects natively, such as rotary speakers for organs and amplifier simulations for bass and guitar sounds. Having a decent starting point for all sounds is very helpful.
Depending on the DSP effect selected, there can be up to 4 modules with configurable parameters. This includes dry/wet controls, effect-specific controls, and so on.
While it is slightly unfortunate that you can’t mix and match modules to get your own custom effect chains, I’m satisfied with the 100 available presets, as they’re all chained in ways that make sense.
Performers will find the DSP effect chains very helpful, allowing them to tune sounds to specific applications and sound systems.
As previously stated, presets are included with most sounds, which means that players who don’t want to dive deep into detailed editing can still enjoy versatility.
If you want to learn more about DSP effect and how they work on the PX-S3000 refer to the video below:
Chorus
Chorus can be engaged separately from the DSP effects and comes in 12 different intensities.
Adding a touch of chorus to sounds can add a bit of depth, with slight delay and detune, which is particularly helpful for synth and electric piano sounds.
The intensity changes the chorus type from a subtle chorus to full-on flanging and delay.
Brilliance
Brilliance allows you to modify your sound to be brighter or mellower. This setting has a range of -3 to +3 and serves as an alternative to using an equalizer as your DSP effect.
Polyphony
The PX-S3000 has 192 notes of maximum polyphony. This is sufficient for any song, regardless of genre, and even allows you to play with layered voices.
High polyphony also means you won’t get notes cutting off with accompaniment mode on, as those involve multiple parts playing at the same time.
Speakers
The speakers on the PX-S3000 are identical to those found on the PX-S1000.
As with the previously reviewed model, I am impressed that Casio opted to include speakers at all, despite the minimal footprint of the PX-S3000.
The speakers sound good and deliver a wide stereo field, even without the simulated Surround Sound. The speakers are powered with two 8W amplifiers.
The speakers are back-facing, so for best results, place the PX-S3000 against the wall to maximize sound reflection.
Features
The PX-S3000 includes many features you don’t normally get on digital pianos. In fact, many of the features discussed here are more commonly associated with arranger keyboards.
Modes
Layer mode, Split mode and Duet Play mode are included on the PX-S3000.
Layer mode allows you to play two sounds simultaneously and comes standard on most keyboards and digital pianos, no matter the price range.
A common use of layer mode involves strings and pianos, delivering a ballad-style tone with a rich sustain.
Since the PX-S3000 comes with many synth pads, you can get even more variations of this playing style.
You can also layer electric pianos with their acoustic counterparts for a harmonically rich tone.
Split mode allows you to play different sounds on the left and right of the keyboard.
This mode is far more fleshed out than the variant included on the PX-S1000, which only allowed you to use a bass sound on the left of the keyboard.
On the PX-S3000, you can specify what tone is assigned to each side. You can even assign two tones to the right side, essentially having layer mode active on the right side.
This is very versatile, and combined with the recording functions, can let you get really close to full songs.
For both modes, you can also adjust the individual parameters of each individual sound. This feature makes the PX-S3000 well-suited for performances.
To boost ease of use further, you also have registrations, which allow you to save all your settings as a complete preset.
The PX-S1000 lacked this feature, making it less suitable for performances. Being able to save settings is particularly helpful since there are thousands of possible combinations available on the PX-S3000.
Finally, you have Duet Play mode, which is tailored to teachers who require a convenient method of demonstration.
Duet Play mode is similar to split mode, but both halves of the keyboard share the same tone and octave range, essentially giving you two half-sized pianos.
This allows instructors to sit beside their students and teach by showing.
Auto Accompaniment
Accompaniment mode is another feature that sets the PX-S3000 apart. This mode allows a backing track to be played based on the keys you play, allowing you to perform as a one-man-band.
This feature will be familiar to keyboard players, and Casio has made great implementations of accompaniment features in their past keyboards.
For the unfamiliar, the lower registers of the keyboard tell the backing track what chords to play to, and the upper registers are free to play whatever sound is currently selected.
This allows you to add excitement to performances on the fly and can be easily accessed via buttons on the front panel.
Also, you can opt for the less-used low register keys to access rhythm variations without excessive movement. Once I got used to the specific key combinations, this became my preferred method of mixing up the rhythms.
The genres on offer here are varied and cover pop, Latin, and ethnic styles. This is a great way to spice up practice sessions and can also serve as a fun alternative to the included metronome.
Arpeggiator
Arpeggiators are not a common feature on digital pianos, but they are welcome additions to keyboards that have guitar and synthesizer leads, allowing quick repetitive patterns to be played by simply holding down multiple keys.
These might not be too useful for classical piano players, but players using the accompaniment mode will certainly find this helpful, particularly when used for specific instruments like guitars.
To get a better idea of how auto accompaniment and arpeggiator work, refer to the video below.
Auto Harmonize
Auto Harmonize mode is somewhat rare in keyboards, but it allows a player to create harmonies for right-hand melodies.
This is done based on the currently set key, and you can define the type of harmonization that happens.
These include 5th harmonies, octaves, and even chords. Like the arpeggiation features, these are a welcome addition for use in conjunction with accompaniment mode.
However, know that you must use either the arpeggiator of auto harmonizer one at a time. They cannot be activated simultaneously.
Song Recording and Playback
The PX-S3000 comes with 6 demo songs but that’s pretty much it. The keyboard doesn’t provide any other songs for practice, unlike many other digital pianos, especially those geared towards beginners.
However, you can also record your own songs using inbuilt audio and MIDI recorders.
MIDI recording allows you to record your playing without committing the selected voices and settings, meaning you’ll be able to change certain details after recording.
This function allows you to record up to three tracks per song, and you can save up to 5 recorded songs in internal memory.
The MIDI recorder is quite advanced, allowing you to select which track you’re recording to.
It even allows you to overdub (adding notes to previously recorded tracks). MIDI data can be further edited in a dedicated program or digital audio workstation.
Each user song includes a left and right part, which can be recorded individually. This is helpful when practicing left- and right-hand parts individually. You can even selectively mute parts as well.
The Audio recorder is an alternate method of recording your own playing.
In this case, you’ll be recording the actual sound of the instrument, so you won’t be able to change the tone, tempo, rhythm and other performance settings after the recording is done.
At the same time audio recordings can be easily played back by computers and smart devices without the need of special software (DAWs, VST Plugins).
You can easily share them on social media, convert to other audio formats (MP3, AAC, etc), or burn to a CD.
The audio files are recorded as 16bit 44.1kHz stereo WAV files, which you can save to a USB drive via the USB type A port.
Connectivity
The PX-S3000 shares its smaller sibling’s excellent connectivity, with a few additions that make for a more complete experience.
A headphone jack ensures that you can have late night practice sessions without disturbing the neighbors.
For this, the PX-S3000 includes two stereo mini jacks (1/8″ | 3.5 mm), which are conveniently located at the front left of the instrument.
The speakers turn off when headphones are plugged in, but this can be modified in the settings menu.
There rest of the port are one the rear panel.
1/4” Line Out jacks (R, L/Mono) are included and allow the PX-S3000 to connect with PA systems or studio interfaces for high-quality sound recording.
An Audio In mini jack is included and allows you to connect your phone or music player and playback songs through built-in speakers.
This is great for practicing to a backing track and is quite convenient.
Alternatively, you can connect audio playback devices via Bluetooth Audio. This bypasses the need for cables, which is certainly convenient.
A USB to Host (Type B) port is located at the back of the piano and allows you to connect the PX-S3000 to supported devices.
This is the main way you’ll connect to Casio’s Chordana app and this also serves as a USB-MIDI connection, allowing you to record to supported software like Propellerhead’s Reason, Cubase and Logic Pro.
To use the port, you might need a Lightning-to-USB Camera adapter for iOS devices, or you could get a Wireless MIDI adapter. The wired option minimizes unwanted latency, whereas the wireless option is less clumsy.
A USB flash drive port (Type A) is included and allows you to connect flash drives to save song files. This is missing from the PX-S1000 and being able to save recorded audio files is a huge plus.
Finally, you have 3 pedal jacks, a damper pedal jack, a proprietary pedal unit jack, and an expression pedal jack.
The damper pedal jack allows you to use any standard damper pedal that has a ¼” connector. The included damper pedal connects straight into this jack.
The expression pedal jack allows you to connect any standard expression pedal that uses the ¼” connector.
This is not something that comes included in the box, but it is nice to have the option for even more expressive playing.
The PX-S3000 also supports both Type 1 and Type 2 expression pedals, and you can assign it to specified parameters from the menus. This is another feature not present on the PX-S1000.
The proprietary pedal unit jack is designed for Casio’s special 3-pedal units.
Unfortunately, this does not support all 3-pedal systems on the market and is mainly designed for the Casio SP-34, which is sold separately.
Chordana Play for iOS and Android
While the PX-S3000 comes with a screen, it is a basic 3-line, text-only screen that doesn’t come with too much real estate.
For people looking for a more graphical method of interacting with the various functions, Casio’s own Chordana Play app lets you utilize your smart devices as a separate touchscreen interface.
While the Chordana Play app was mainly designed for tutorials and lessons, Casio keyboards can be connected for direct function control.
This allows you to change sounds and rhythm/accompaniment settings, and even control recording functions, straight from the app.
This improves the experience, but I found the Chordana Play app to be somewhat slow when used with the PX-S3000, despite the smooth experience with the PX-S1000.
I expect this is a result of the huge array of sounds and features, which adds to the load time of each menu and list.
This is unfortunate, as the app improved the experience with the PX-S1000 significantly. I hope future updates will optimize the app further, since having a large touch interface really helps make the PX-S3000 feel more fluid.
Thankfully, the PX-S3000 is a complete experience without the app.
The small screen might not be the best method to navigate the many features and sub-menus, but its still perfectly usable. Being able to save entire registrations also makes navigation on stage that much easier.
For now, I’d say the app works fine for home use, but if you’re on stage, the delay makes it generally unusable.
You’ll sometimes need a full two seconds before a menu loads, which far from ideal (maybe it was just the device I was using, so feel free to share your experience with the app).
Accessories
Keyboard Stand
The PX-S3000 does not come with a stand, but most generic stands work well. Just note that you may find most to be oversized due to the keyboard’s small form factor.
If a generic X- or Z- style stand doesn’t look visually pleasing, you can opt for the matching Casio CS-68P stand, which was designed for the new CDP-S and PX-S digital pianos.

Casio CS-68P Stand
Personally, I’d go with an X- or Y-stand if I were going to use the PX-S3000 on stage.
For home use, the CS-68P furniture-style stand will provide more stability to your setup, and a more pleasing appearance overall.
The PX-S3000’s small size fits most if not all stands available commercially. Here are a few good options for you to consider:
- RockJam Xfinity Double-X Stand (collapsible)
- Pyle Z-Style Adjustable Stand
Damper Pedal
The SP-3 is a basic square-shaped switch pedal, which works but is less than ideal for the PX-S3000.

Casio SP-2 Damper Pedal
The PX-S3000 supports half-pedaling, but the SP-3 only has a binary on/off option. Swapping this out with a larger, more sophisticated pedal is definitely recommended.
As usual, I recommend checking out the M-Audio SP-2, which is one of the most popular sustain pedals available out there. It has a piano-style design, excellent build quality and durability.

M-Audio SP-2 Sustain Pedal
3-Pedal Unit
The Casio SP-34 is specifically designed for the PX-S series and allows the use of soft, sostenuto, and damper pedals in a single unit.
For those looking for a complete digital piano experience, this is essential.
If you’re interested in using the PX-S3000 as an arranger keyboard, the 3-pedal unit doesn’t add much to the experience.
However, the SP-34 seems to be the only option if you want half-damper support.

Casio SP-34 Pedal Unit
I’d say the SP-34 appeals to classical pianists who need to be proficient with pedaling and footwork.
Do note that the PX-S3000 does not support the previous SP-33 pedal unit.
Expression Pedal
Most people may consider expression pedals an unnecessary purchase, and it depends on the styles of music you play.
For instance, pad and string ensemble players can attest to the importance of expression pedals, allowing for volume swells and drops that add to the realism while playing.
There are a ton of expression pedals out there, but unlike sustain or damper pedals, most should work fine, as they’re all built on the same principles and design.

Moog EP-3 Expression Pedal
If you’re looking for an expression pedal, I recommend the Moog EP-3 Expression Pedal, which is affordable while still feeling solid and responsive.
Of course, if you just want to use the PX-S3000 for standard piano playing, an expression pedal is not required.
Carrying Bag
If you travel a lot and plan to move the PX-S3000 around often, you may want to get a carrying bag or case that will make transportation easier and safer.
Specifically for the new PX-S series (will fit the CDP-S series as well), Casio designed the SC-800, a high-quality protective case that you can get for a little over $100.

Casio SC-800 Keyboard Case
Headphones
Headphones come in very handy when you want to practice in private, focusing solely on your playing and not disturbing others nearby.
Moreover, a good pair of headphones will provide a clearer and more detailed sound compared to the onboard speakers.
Check out this guide to learn how to choose the best-sounding headphones for your digital piano.
Summary
- Excellent design and build quality
- Super-slim form factor
- Runs on 6 AA batteries
- Inclusion of screen means navigation is easier
- Solid keyboard action with a nice feel
- A large selection of great sounds
- A variety of piano tones with tweakable parameters
- 192-note polyphony
- Accompaniment mode with a large selection of rhythms
- Built-in Audio Recorder (WAV, 16bit, 44.1kHz, stereo)
- Ability to save sounds and settings (registrations)
- Editable DSP effects
- Comes with 2 assignable knobs and a pitch bend wheel
- Bluetooth 5.0 (Audio)
- Key pivot length is quite short
- Glossy finish is a fingerprint magnet
- Touch-based controls aren’t tactile
- No Bluetooth MIDI support
- Chordana app feels slow
I loved the PX-S1000 when I reviewed it, and the PX-S3000 replicates the innovations found there while adding even more features to the mix.
Having an in-built screen means navigation is much easier, and Casio used the ease of operation to add in more sounds and a full-fledged accompaniment mode, making the PX-S3000 a rare digital piano/arranger piano hybrid.
All the pros of the PX-S1000 apply here, and you’re getting a substantial upgrade to previous Privia digital pianos in nearly every regard.
A lot of the improvements truly shine in the PX-S3000. The high polyphony count works great with the Layer mode and accompaniment features, ensuring that no sounds cut off abruptly and that most sounds take advantage of the lighter keys.
The PX-S3000 feels like Casio pushing the PX-S1000 to the limit, and I’m very happy with the result. This is an excellent keyboard with a ton of features that make it a joy to play, and I’m still amazed at how slim it is.
While there are 700 sounds, most sound terrific. This is definitely not a case of quantity over quality.
The fact that most sounds come with DSP settings that can be tweaked to taste is fantastic. Customization lets you make each sound your own and being able to save registrations is another welcome addition.
The PX-S3000 manages to fix most of my issues with the PX-S1000, apart from the short pivot point, which to be fair is something inherent in the design.
The PX-S1000 was excellent, yet the PX-S3000 adds a lot more to the mix. The additions definitely justify the extra money.
With that said, I wouldn’t say the PX-S3000 is a no-brainer. Consider whether the extra features are necessary to your own needs before making a purchase.
The PX-S1000 and PX-S3000 share the same dimensions, sound engine, and keyboard.
The former is comparatively basic, with 18 sounds to the PX-S3000’s 700. You’re also sacrificing the accompaniment mode and ease of navigation that comes with a screen.
However, these features are just bonuses for people looking for a great digital piano for practice purposes.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for a keyboard geared towards performances, the PX-S3000 is the choice for you.
The screen and extra knobs make the PX-S3000 easier to use and truly shine in performance settings.
Here are some of the main differences between the Casio PX-S3000 and PX-S1000:
- 18 Built-in Tones
- 2-track MIDI recorder (1 song)
- USB type B
- 60 Built-in Songs (for playback and practice)
- 700 Built-in Tones
- 3-track MIDI recorder (5 songs)
- USB type B + USB type A (for connecting flash drives)
- Built-in Display
- MIDI and Audio playback (from the flash drive)
- Audio Recorder (WAV, 16bit, 44.1kHz, stereo)
- 200 Built-in Rhythms (6 chord input modes)
- Auto Harmonize function (12 types)
- Arpeggiator (100 types)
- Pitch Bend Wheel
- 2 Assignable Knobs
- Fully editable DSP parameters (+100 presets)
- A few extra Reverb and Chorus effects
- Registration function (96 sets)
- Expression Pedal (assignable jack)
All positivity aside, there are definitely points where the PX-S3000 could improve.
The key action’s short pivot length affects an otherwise enjoyable playing experience. The glossy finish, while striking, does leave it susceptible to fingerprints and scratches.
Finally, having Bluetooth MIDI would be preferable to Bluetooth Audio, since that would make connecting the Chordana app much easier and less cumbersome since cables would be unnecessary.
Check the availability and current price of the Casio PX-S3000 in your region:
Alternatives
There aren’t many competitors to the PX-S3000 in this price range.
Most stage pianos and digital pianos that have functionality similar to the PX-S3000 cost well over $1000, which makes Casio pioneers in some way.
Check the video below to see how the PX-S3000 compares to some of the famous stage pianos on the market including the Yamaha CP88, Korg Grandstage and Dexibell VIVO S7 Pro:
As you can see most of these instruments cost more than double the price of the PX-S3000.
If you’re looking for something more affordable, I’d recommend checking out the Casio PX-560 model, which despite being older than the PX-S3000, offers even more options for sound customization and additional features for live performances.
You can read my in-depth review of the PX-560 here.
Hello lucas
This a very nice and deep review that you have written, no doubt it will be helpfull.
I totally agree to most of what you are saying. Moreover about bluetooth that would have been better midi than audio ( but why jesus did they have to not implement both ???? ).
3 words about Chordana :
– The app do not give access to more features in the PX S3000, it just ease everything like a sensitive graphic interface is doing it on almost all the piano that already feature it.
– Chordana is a bit slow on my 80€ chinese pad too. I thought it was due to the poor quality of the pad itself. However, I apeciate greatly the comfort given by this graphic interface. notice also that the more it goes, the more I’m quick to navigate into the piano interface without using the app.
– Chordana brings a killer feature when it comes to the midi player : thanks to it ( and google ), I can download .mid files, then read them and watch the note cascade within no more than 3 minutes ! ! the cascade is an incredible tool to ease the learning for a beginer ( I am a beginer )… and it is working as fine with PX S1000 …. and that’s probably not the only feature that coud make the users happy
Then just one point where, as a beginer, I do not consider the short pivot keybed like you. I really feel no discomfort when having to play between the black keys … at least not because the pivot, but because as a beginer I’m not accurate enough to put my fingers without to move a black key, most of the time. But I really do not feel the key would have to be smoother at this point
Hey Philippe, thanks for the kind words and your input.
Yes, the Chordana Play app is mostly a remote controller that makes it easier to navigate all the sound and settings on the instrument, though it does have a few extra features, including a MIDI player that you mentioned (with a piano roll, and lesson mode), which makes it a useful tool for beginners.
As for the key pivot length, I agree that for many beginners that isn’t going to be a problem, but for more experienced players and people with longer fingers this can be a bit annoying.
EDIT to the previous reponse :
I discovered, thanks to PianomanChuck’s review, That in fact almost all Chordana functions can work through bluetooth.
Only the Remote control functions will remain out of access because this tool require a specific conection to the piano – thus USB only -, that do not work through bluetooth…… ok this is not such a drawback imho…. but what a shame
Indeed, some of the functions on the app will work without a MIDI connection, but you won’t be able to send MIDI data to the app, for example, to use the scoring feature.
Thank you. I purchase the 3000
Glad to help! I hope you enjoy your instrument.
Excellent choice @Roger. The more it goes, the more I’m enjoying it. A friend of mine, who is pro musician, and an excellent jazz pianist, told me that he liked a lot the keyboard
@Lucas, I also asked him about his feeling of the shortened keys, and he answered that as the keys a slightly lighter than on accoustic pianos, the feeling when the fingers are closing the pivot gets simply closer to a grand piano feeling….
Hey Philippe, I agree the keys on the PX-S series are slightly lighter that those found in acoustic pianos.
However, the pivot point is definitely shorter than what you normally find on a grand piano. Grand pianos have much longer key actions, which increases the pivot length and makes it possible to play further up the keys with very little extra effort.
Do you prefer the Casio PX-S3000 or Roland FP-30? I’m looking for a piano in this price range so would appreciate your opinion.
Hi Beth, these two are quite different in terms of their feature sets and target audiences.
The Roland FP-30 is a more simple and straightforward instrument with minimal features and sound-shaping capabilities. Its main purpose is to provide an authentic piano-playing experience, everything else is just a bonus.
The PX-S3000, on the other hand, has a lot more going on than just a few dozen sounds and several basic features.
It offers 700 built-in tones and various options for sound design, including 700 tones, hundreds of editable DSP parameters, effects, assignable knobs, and a pitch bend wheel.
So what instrument is better for you will depend on how you’re going to use it.
If you’re gigging or working in the studio, or you just want to be able to play around with the sound and sculpt “your own” sound from scratch, I’d definitely recommend the PX-S3000.
If, on the other hand, you’re buying an instrument mainly to play and practice piano at home, the FP-30 seems like a more reasonable option. I hope this helps.
Does the S3000 include a simulated rotary sound with a speed control? I thought I read somewhere that it does.
Hi Paul, the PX-S3000 does have simulated rotary speaker effect with 3 speaker types, 2 speeds (slow, fast), and a few other adjustable parameters.
To follow-up on Paul’s question: Can you then put the rotary speaker effect on the k-1 or k-2 assignable knob? Thanks!
Absolutely, any DSP effect on the PX-S3000 can be linked to the assignable knobs.
Thank you, Lucas, for another helpful review!
I have owned several 88-note digital pianos in the past 30 years – starting with a very expensive Kurtzweil console, then a Yamaha Clavinova, then a higher-end Casio (2004), a Yamaha MOXF8, a Korg Kronos 88, a Casio PX-5S, a Casio PX-560. I recently sold the MOXF8, Kronos 88, Casio PX-5S but still have the old Casio and the PX-560 along with a 76-note Yamaha Tyros 5 and half a dozen vintage synths. I am seriously considering replacing my PX-560 if the action on the PX-S3000 is a big enough improvement. Of course I’d lose the Hex layers, the built-in screen and other features. I would love to get your opinion on this. I’m not gigging much anymore and when I do I have plenty of other keyboards to use so this is mostly for home use and a great action, great grand piano sounds and great EP sounds are most important to me. My other option iwould be something like a Casio GP-400 or Dexibell H7 but from all my readings, these hybrids are close but not quite there yet and they are too big and expensive to only keep for 3 years.
Thanks in advance for your input!
Hien
Hi Hein, it seems that you have a lot of experience with many different models, so you probably know better than anyone which instrument you need. In my opinion, the new action in the PX-S3000 is not much of an improvement and it’s probably not worth replacing your PX-560 with the PX-S3000, based just on this aspect. The hybrids you mentioned (the Dexibell is not really a hybrid) will sound and feel better than both the PX-560 and PX-S3000, especially the GP-400, which is a full-fledged hybrid piano with a grand piano mechanism. But these are also much more expensive than the PX series, so there’s no comparison here.
How as a reviewer did you not notice that the black keys were significantly lighter than the white keys on this piano? It is something that ThePianoforever channel on youtube pointed out and proved in his excellent review of this piano. That is a major flaw of this piano and also of your review. It’s disappointing to see that he was the only piano reviewer to notice that major flaw.
Hi Dimitrios,
As I mentioned multiple times, when I test a piano I pay attention to how it feels WHEN I play it, and not what the weights show. Pianos are not robots, there’s no precise ‘standard’ that all pianos must follow. This is especially true for digital pianos. After all, the CDP-S and PX-S instruments are extremely compact and weigh around 25 lbs, so you can’t expect them to behave like a 500 lbs acoustic piano.
Again, I didn’t do the measurements of the key down weight when I tested it, but when I played the keyboard, I didn’t notice anything out of ordinary in that regard. Once the pandemic is over, I will head to the nearest music store to double-check that. But, I doubt that I would miss this potential flaw if it was THAT evident during the playtest.
I’m sure ThePianoforever has done an excellent job with the PX-S3000 review. However, ultimately, it doesn’t really matter what impressions the reviewer has of the instrument, because until you play it yourself, you can’t be 100% sure if it’s plays and sounds ‘right’ to you.
Absolutely agree! I saw Jame’s video before I checked the PX-S1000/3000 in the shop. I really love Jame’s (Mr ThePianoforever) videos and he is one of the best reviewers on youtube. But overall for 95% (including me) of players this will not be an issue and the entire discussion between him and CASIO got a little bit off-track. When you play the PX-S1000/3000 you will not feel it. Only issues I personally have with the key action is that it feels overall on the lighter side and I need to get used to the textured key surface….
SInce I live almost next to Europe’s largest music shop I was able to check most of the common models next to each other. Personally for me the best key action is Kawai MP7/ES8 (after MP11)… but as said the CASIO is not as bad as shown by James….
Yes, they are, noticeable. I’m a total beginner, but it is noticeable even for me.
But, if you ask me, it is a not huge deal breaker. I don’t see that as a problem. Honestly, I think this instrument is a huge value for money and is really really great sounding instrument. The small form is great and sound quality is noticeably better than Roland FP-10 or FP-30, which has great action and even escapement simulation for a reasonable price. But their speakers are not on the best side. I guess you can’t have everything in one product! 🙂
If you ask me, major flaw for Casio 3000 is the fact that they “forgot” to put Bluetooth MIDI connection 🙁
Somebody said it is slow, has high latency, but let be realistic. Those keyboards are for beginner, Experienced pianist buy much better models. So, a great connection is really important to me. I don’t want to deal with apple overpriced USB adapter and to have the bulk of cables flapping around! And I want to use apps for learning piano and all those apps greatly benefit from Bluetooth MIDI!
Roland FP-10 has great Bluetooth MIDI and you can connect almost every possible iPhone, iPad Pro and use apps like a garage band to make incredible music piece for almost no investment. Just you and your talent! Today, everyone has a cell phone!
I Casio had BT MIDI, for me, it would be no brainer combo. But lacks of BT MIDI drives me to Roland FP 10 or 30!
Yamaha 45 doesn’t have Escapement nor BT MIDI, so it’s don’t exist in my book. Kawai is interesting, has BT MIDI but from some reason, I don’t like their entry-level models. They look cheap and not too reliable.
Hi, Not sure why BT MIDI is a showstopper. There are some BT MIDI devices for 50 USD available that you can simply plug on. What is a real showstopper when it comes to the Roland FP10/30 is that they both lack Line Outs.
Lucas, thanks for a great review.
Please, be so kind and compare Casio 3000 and PX-870, especially concerning the newest technology used in the 3000 model.
Also, please put Apple thunderbolt to USB adapter as affiliate Amazon link, as this thing is necessary for Casio APP to be used with iPad and people could buy that over you link as thanks for your effort!
Thanks again!
Hi Lucas, thanks for the amazingly detailed review. In your opinion, how does this compare to the Roland RD88 given that they are similarly priced? In terms over sound sample, key action had overall build quality / ownership experience.
Hi Percival,
Well, these two are indeed quite similar not only in price but also in form factor. Both relatively compact, lightweight, and gig-friendly.
I definitely prefer the action of the RD88 for acoustic piano sounds. The PX-S3000’s action, on the other hand, is a bit lighter and therefore more versatile. So, I’d prefer it for playing organs, electric pianos, synths, and other non-piano sounds. As for the sounds, both keyboards offer A LOT to choose from. Plus, you have plenty of options to adjust each sound to your liking. I can’t say either of these models has an edge over one another.
Some don’t like the brighter, more ‘percussive’ sound of the Roland, others are in love with it. It may not be perfect for the classical repertoire, but by no means does the RD88 sound bad or unrealistic. The PX-S3000 is also a noticeable improvement over the previous generations, and its Stage Piano preset is my personal favorite. Again, it’s not like you’re stuck with just one preset, there are tons of tweaking options and presets that will perform well in different situations.
With regards to build quality and overall design, my vote goes to the RD88 simply because of its more traditional old-fashioned design. It could be just me, but I’d feel more comfortable working with real physical buttons (rather than touch-based controls) when performing on stage.
While using the PX-S3000’s controls was a pleasant experience overall, it’s hard to know what happens when you’re on stage, your fingers get a little moist or dirty… What I’m trying to say is that I find physical controls to be more reliable in situations like this. Another thing to look out for in the PX-S3000 is its glass-like surface, which tends to get covered with fingerprints pretty quickly (not sure how scratch-proof it is, probably not very, considering it’s plastic).
All in all, both instruments have their strengths and weaknesses, so depending on your intended use, you might prefer one or the other.
I’m wondering what your thoughts on comparing the px-s3000 to one of the other PX units like the 360 or 560?
Even though the PX-S3000 is a newer model and has a lot of power packed into it, I still consider the PX-560 a superior instrument when it comes to music production and editing capabilities. The 5-inch touchscreen makes things so much easier and the PX-S3000’s tiny screen just can’t compete with that.
I had a chance to test it today with the Chordana Play for Piano app version 2.3.0 build 80 on my OnePlus 5 Android 10 phone connected via USB cable. The app is very intuitive to use, I like it better than Roland’s Piano Partner 2 and Piano Every Day apps, which are not as intuitive and self-explanatory. Chordana Play for Piano reacted snappy, zero lag! Auto-accompaniment works great, not cheesy at all. Much better than the auto-accompaniment in the above mentioned Roland apps, which offer 21 styles no matter which Roland piano is connected (i.e. the auto-accompaniment is a feature of the apps not the respective piano).The auto-accompaniment in Yamaha’s CSP models is still one level up compared to the PX-S3000’s, in that Yamaha reaches an even higher level of realism and complexity of accompanying instruments. Nevertheless, the PX-S3000’s auto-accompaniment is very good. It’s a pity that the PX-S3000’s key action is not that great. The black keys are lighter than the white ones. Is there another recent Casio model with better keys and the same auto-accompaniment?
Answering my own question: the Celviano AP-650 might have a similar auto-accompaniment but all these buttons above the keyboard put me off. A Celviano GP-510 with auto-accompaniment accessible only from Chordana Play for Piano app (like the Yamaha CSPs) without all these ugly buttons would be fantastic. Same for Kawai. I don’t understand why Casio and Kawai are so conservative in their higher end models. Making additional features accessible only by app would not compromise their classical design.
Among portable models, there are also the CGP-700, PX-360 and PX-560 that have quite a few rhythms built in. I think the reason why higher-end console digital pianos rarely have a wide selection of rhythms is because it’s not what the main target audience of such instruments needs in most cases. That’s why we often see the same traditional minimalist design and focus on the piano playing experience rather than versatile features that would appeal to a wider audience. With that said, I agree that adding some features via the app would be a great compromise. It would retain both the minimalist ethos and provide extended functionality for those who need it.
How I wish I had not followed your recommendations blindly? Today I am stranded with a Digital Piano that has not only ruined my 10 year old child’s form & action but the company won’t respond to my sticky key issues because it is past their meagre warranty issue. I hope you revisit your reviews & recalibrate the ratings. This Piano has serious issues.
Please check these YouTube videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKAfScFK0QU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7xHgXFEJUE&t=0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OB9tqkPKdeU&t=0s
Lucas do you even know that differently weighted keys can completely cramp & ruin a beginner/ intermediate players action forever.?
This flawed keyboard by Casio has ruined the way my 10 year old plays on acoustic piano in his music class. Had it not been for James’s youtube video, I would not have known why my son plays the way he does.
Hey Rosemary, sorry to hear about your experiences, and thanks for sharing this. I’ve already explained my position multiple times, so not I’m not gonna repeat myself. You can read my comment from April 24, 2020 at the end of this review: https://www.pianodreamers.com/casio-px-s1000-review/
As things are today, no digital piano is going to provide you with the exact same feel as an acoustic. Being able to adjust your playing to different key actions (digital or acoustic) is a part of becoming a pianist.
Casio PX-S’s models are the slimmest digital pianos on the market right now, so it’s not surprising that they had to adjust the action to fit into such a compact chassis and compensate for a shorter pivot point. Personally, I doubt that it can “cramp ruin a beginner/intermediate technique forever”, but it will definitely take some adjustment when you’re transitioning to other key actions and back (though the same can be said about all key-based instruments in general).
Hopefully, you can find the instrument that fits your needs, and your child enjoys playing it!
Lucas,
Thank you for your reply but the fact that you have rated this piano so high despite its flawed key action and precisely for that, baffles me. I think it’s time you revise your rating to reflect that. It honestly puts a question w.r.t. your integrity.
Thank you for the suggestion, Rosemary, I’ll think about how we can improve our rating system in the future.
The relatively high rating of the PX-S3000 is for the most part due to its amazing sound shaping capabilities and arranger features. In this price range, there are hardly any competitors that are as powerful. Realistic key touch on such instruments is not as important as on instruments that focus solely on providing a realistic piano playing experience.
Also, it’s important to remember that these ratings are highly subjective because most of the criteria we use to evaluate instruments are qualitative rather than quantitative, therefore the rating is a mere representation of how we feel about the instrument’s performance and our general impressions.
Lucas
I am writing on behalf of Ms. Lele. I teach music to both her kids aged 10 & 8 that said, since it is your blog, I cannot tell you what to do & not to do wrt how you test, rate & review products on this site. But as a music teacher for over 22 years and having born to a conductor father, I will argue that once bad habits are formed, it is nearly impossible to rectify. In most cases, I recommend that my pupil have acoustic pianos at home, but there are many like the Lele’s who have space constraints and have to settle for digital pianos which is absolutely fine by me.
Now coming back to the issue I am here to discuss. Only after we had switched back to classes in person after almost 18 months of doing online that I noticed the awkwardness with which both of Ms Lele’s kids played the piano. Both kids have been under my tutelage for nearly 4 years now & never before had I observed them play it so awkwardly.
Only after I visited them at their home earlier this week & supervised the kids play their Casio did I realize where they had developed that awkwardness. Further research online lead me to the videos that Ms. Lele has referred to in her earlier response. And I definitely think, it’s our responsibility to let Casio know that they genuinely have a problem that needs immediate attention.
The reason I say it is our responsibility is because, in his retort to the video uploaded by James Shawcross, the Casio spokesperson keeps boasting about the stellar reviews they have been receiving from the online community such as yours. Therefore, I think it is our collective responsibility to tell them the truth. Rest I leave it to you.
Erik Mehta
Hello Lucas
Rosemary here, once again appreciate your quick response. Had it not being for your high ratings I would have gone on to purchase Yamaha Clavinova. I have always referred to your website and until this episode, it has served me well. That’s all.
Regards
Rosemary Lele
I took piano lessons and have played piano for over 40 years. I have read and seen almost every video on this keyboard. I understand the action on the PX-S3000 is not the same as an acoustic piano. I don’t think there is any digital keyboard in this price range that can rival a real piano’s action. And I agree it is better for beginners to learn on a good acoustic piano. However, I have owned the PX-3000 for over 2 years now and love it. Piano sound quality is one of the most important things to me because I do a lot of recording. I would even venture to say that the piano sound quality of a keyboard trumps the action (some will disagree but for what I do in music, sound quality is the most important). In my opinion, this keyboard has one of the best piano sounds of any keyboard even some costing much more. It also has a reasonable weighted key action for such a small, portable instrument. The additional sounds, rhythms, recording ability, and portability are just added bonuses on such a great keyboard. I continue playing an acoustic piano and the PX-S3000 regularly for hours a day and have no trouble switching and adapting to each. Being a versatile keyboardist is a great skill to learn. I have used the keyboard at the park, at church, at home, and almost anywhere I can bring it. It is fantastic! I know what I am getting with the PX-S3000 (pros and cons) and would buy it again in a heartbeat. It serves my purposes extremely well, and I would have kept the rating of this keyboard in the high 8 and lower 9 range like you had it before the change. There are many, many PX-S3000 owners that love this keyboard. Just as I understand and respect differing opinions and comments on the key action, you cannot dismiss the overwhelmingly positive comments from so many users.
I have this piano and it’s onboard piano samples are dissapointing compared to midi samples which are more realistic. It’s 2 sensor action limits dynamic range, added to the problems noted of the shorter key length cause you to overplay, and thus get get hand and finger fatigue easily. The casio px range will not be on my list for a future purchase because of these issues.
I forgot to mention, the menu system is a nightmare. You have to jump through hoops to do the smallest thing. It’s totaly non intuitive.